![]() |
Rabbi David Wolpe of Sinai Temple in L.A |
So it was that three weeks before the Supreme Court cleared the way for
same-sex marriage in California, the rabbi, David Wolpe, announced in a
letter to the synagogue that gay marriages would be performed in this
107-year-old congregation, as soon as the court ruling he anticipated
was handed down.
Celebrating same-sex marriages is hardly a new stand
for Conservative Jewish congregations. But the decision in this
distinctive synagogue has set off a storm of protests in recent days,
particularly from Persian Jews, reflecting not only the unusual makeup
of the congregation but also the generational and cultural divisions
among some Jews over how to respond to changing civil views of
homosexuality.
“To officiate a union that is expressly not for the same godly purpose
of procreation and to call such a relationship ‘sanctified’ is
unacceptable to a sound mind,” M. Michael Naim, an architect, said in an
open letter to other Iranian members of the congregation.
“Homosexuality is explicitly condemned in Scripture and has been
categorically and passionately rejected by all classical Jewish legal
and ethical thinkers as a cardinal vice in the same category as incest,
murder and idolatry.”
This is not the first time that Rabbi Wolpe, 54, has attracted national
attention for the views he has pressed on his congregation. In one noted
sermon, he expressed doubt about one of the great stories of Jewish
life, the exodus of Jews from Egypt into the wilderness.
The synagogue is an anchor of the Los Angeles Jewish community, and
Rabbi Wolpe himself is such an entrenched figure there that there seems
little chance that its existence, or his tenure, is endangered. Still,
the argument within the congregation offered a striking contrast to the
images of gay couples across this state rushing to be married, reflected
in smiling faces in newspapers and on evening television.
Mr. Naim said he was leaving the congregation. Rabbi Wolpe said that 10
families had told him so far that they intended to either leave the
synagogue or withdraw their children from its school, to protest a
policy they denounced as a violation of Jewish teachings and the
traditions they had brought here when they fled the Iranian revolution
of 1979.
Rabbi Wolpe said that based on letters he had received, and comments
voiced to him as he walked the aisles of the sprawling, sunny sanctuary
on Wilshire Boulevard during Saturday morning service, close to half of
the congregation of 2,000 families, which is about half Persian, was
unhappy with the new policy.
“The Persian community is pretty heavily weighted against the idea of
same-sex marriage,” Rabbi Wolpe said. “And there are some non-Persians
who also oppose it, and have made their convictions clear to me.”
“I’ve been wanting to do this for a long time,” Rabbi Wolpe said. “I was
doing it on my internal timetable in the synagogue, which was to try to
bring people along slowly because I knew this would be very difficult
for many people. I think it’s the most controversial thing I’ve ever
done or will do.”
The decision by Rabbi Wolpe, who has been at this synagogue for 15 years
and is one of the country’s best known rabbis, was very much in
accordance with other Conservative congregations. Conservative Judaism
is perched between the more liberal Reform and Reconstructionist
movements, which have long accepted gay clergy members, and the
Orthodox, which rejects it.
Some Conservative congregations have gay rabbis and cantors. But the
announcement and its aftermath served as a reminder of one of the things
that distinguish Sinai Temple
and nearby Beverly Hills: a heavy and at times insular presence of
Persians, as many call themselves, and many of them are fiercely
protective of their past and religious beliefs.
At Saturday services last week, the roll call of deceased members read
off during the memorial conclusion of the service, in preparation for
the chanting of the mourners’ Kaddish, was rich with Persian names, a
notable addition to the usual roster of names like Abramowitz and
Schwartz. And the girl who read from the Torah to observe her bat
mitzvah was the daughter of Persian immigrants.
The resistance Rabbi Wolpe is finding among Persian Jews is, like much of the country, generational. Rabbi Ed Feinstein of Valley Beth Shalom
in Encino, which also has a significant Persian population, said that
he has long performed same-sex ceremonies, without any pushback.
“In my experience, it’s all about generations,” Rabbi Feinstein said in
an e-mail. “First-generation Persian Jews, immigrants who were raised in
the Moslem culture of Iran, have very strong prejudices against gays
and lesbians, along with other strong feelings about matters such as
women’s roles in families and society, families’ control over the lives
of kids, roles of husbands and wives, etc. Second-generation American
Persian Jews, raised in the U.S. and generally college educated, have
very different opinions.”
And the decision has backing among some Persian members of Sinai. “There
are some people who are not yet ready to accept nontraditional views,”
said Dora Kadisha, a member of the congregation. “But we cannot look the
other way knowing that within our community we do have gays and
lesbians. We have to embrace them not only in the families but in our
congregations.”
Her father, Parviz Nazarian, one of the best-known members of the
Persian community in Los Angeles, also said he supported the new policy.
“Many people are following Rabbi Wolpe,” he said. “They are with him.”
Rabbi Wolpe said that while he looked forward to conducting same-sex
marriages, he would continue to refuse to perform interfaith weddings,
again reflecting the policy of the Conservative movement.
In laying the groundwork for the new policy over the past months, Rabbi
Wolpe led a series of classes and workshops. “This is an important and
fraught topic — people have very passionate feelings about it,” he said,
opening the final one of the meetings. Moments later, the rabbi was
challenged by a young Persian man asking why the synagogue should not
simply refer to gay marriage as “a sodomy contract.”
The rabbi’s letter to the congregation argued that Jewish law not only
permitted such unions, but also should embrace them.
“Our clergy believe that this decision is in the best tradition of the
Conservative movement which views the Torah as a living document that
allows room for new understandings and approaches,” it said. “As we have
modernized the role of women and many other practices, the demand on
the part of our brothers and sisters who are gay to be able to live in a
sanctified relationship is a call to our conscience and our
responsibility as Jews.”
Laurie L. Levenson, a law professor and a member of the congregation,
said that she believed most of the congregation supported Rabbi Wolpe.
“It is a big congregation with people from many backgrounds,” she said.
“Marriage equality is a new concept for some of the Persian families.
There is an educational process that needs to take place. Thankfully,
Rabbi Wolpe has so much credibility that he can pull this off.”
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: July 5, 2013
An earlier version of this article misstated the given name of the father of a member of Sinai Temple. He is Parviz Nazarian, not Pouran Nazarian.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/06/us/rabbi-takes-a-stand-for-gay-marriage-and-a-segment-of-the-congregation-rebels.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Correction: July 5, 2013
An earlier version of this article misstated the given name of the father of a member of Sinai Temple. He is Parviz Nazarian, not Pouran Nazarian.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/06/us/rabbi-takes-a-stand-for-gay-marriage-and-a-segment-of-the-congregation-rebels.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment
TO COMMENT: